Powered by intelligent SLM/LLM routing

You don't call the chief surgeon for a sprained ankle. Why call GPT-4o for routine prompts?

ModelTriage acts as an automated intake nurse for your AI stack. We lint, summarize and route low-level tasks to lightning-fast SLMs — reserving expensive frontier models only for critical reasoning. Cut AI compute costs by 70–90% without losing quality.

Launch interactive sandbox
Triage pipeline
90% fewer premium tokens
Frontier model sees100 clean tokens, not 1,000 raw
How triage works across industries

Tailored triage for every domain

The same routing engine, tuned to the shape of your work. Pick an industry to see the strategy and the numbers.

⚖️

Legal & litigation support

Raw query

Analyze this 80-page discovery document and extract breach of contract clauses.

Triage strategy

Lightweight SLMs parse sections, filter out standard boilerplate, and pass only high-risk clauses to Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

88% token reductionCost down from $4.20 to $0.48 per document

Hello — what can we help with today?

Connected & ready
Your assistantpicks the right AI for each question
All good
Summarise docket entry 42 in Smith v. Halloran and tell me what deadline it creates.
This answer cost $0.0006You saved 80% vs. GPT-4o

This was a short, clearly defined question, so it was handled in one quick step.

Summary: Entry 42 is the court's order granting Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the amended complaint.

  • The response deadline moves from March 14 to April 4.
  • No hearing was set, and no other dates were disturbed.
  • Your reply, if any, would then be due April 18 under the local rules.

Why this was cheap: the question didn't need the most expensive assistant — it cost 80% less than sending it straight to a premium model. Please verify dates against the docket before calendaring.

Review the 60-page settlement agreement, flag any indemnity or limitation-of-liability risks, and draft a client memo explaining them.
This answer cost $0.0031You saved 78% vs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet

This was a long document, so it was broken into three steps and combined into one answer.

  • Indemnity (§ 9.2): the clause is one-way in the counterparty's favour and has no cap — the biggest exposure in the agreement.
  • Limitation of liability (§ 11): caps damages at fees paid in the prior 12 months, but carves out confidentiality breaches, which sits awkwardly with § 9.2.
  • Client memo: a two-page draft explaining both issues in plain language, with two suggested redlines.

What you saved: handling it in steps cost 78% less than sending the whole document to a premium model at once. Attorney review is still required.

Choose how careful you'd like the answer to be, then type your question.

Simple questions, summaries and quick drafts — answered fast at the lowest cost.

Answers are drafts, not legal advice — always review before filing or sending to a client.

What you paid vs. the usual way
$0.0031instead of$0.014278.2% less
Time to answer
1.6s vs 3.9s
Based on your most recent question